|
LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT
King County, Washington
SPECIAL BUSINESS MEETING
November 22, 2005
A special meeting of the Board of
Commissioners of the Lakehaven Utility District, King County,
Washington, was held on November 22, 2005 at the Lakehaven Center, 31531
First Avenue South, Federal Way, Washington, 98003.
President Stewart opened the meeting at 6:00 p.m. and asked
Commissioner Mayer to lead the flag salute. Members/officials present
were as follows:
Ed Stewart - President of the Board
Beverly Tweddle - Vice President of the Board
Don Miller - Secretary of the Board
Tom Jovanovich - Commissioner
Dick Mayer - Commissioner
Don Perry - General Manager
Bert Ross - Engineering Manager
Steve Pritchett - General Counsel
Morgan Dennis - Director of Finance/Information System
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Upon motion of Commissioner Mayer, which was duly seconded by
Commissioner Tweddle, the Board unanimously approved the evening’s
agenda as amended below:
- Action Item #72, Customer Service Bill Printing Outsourcing; defer
this item.
CITIZENS COMMENT
Commissioner Mayer reported that the Christmas tree in the lobby of
the Administration Building had been decorated earlier in the day with
tags depicting the needs of several families within the District’s
service area. He encouraged everyone to support this cause.
Mr. Mark Freitas was in the audience to address the Board on several
items. He began by thanking the Board for what they do in this community
as water and sewer service is critical. He added he is a real estate
developer and has contact with District staff and appreciates the
service they provide. He added he is also an amateur radio operator and
appreciates the antennas the District has allowed to be installed on
District water tanks as a service to their organization. He then stated
that one of his duties as a fire commissioner was to evaluate and look
at the possibility of having paid staff move to City hall. He prefaced
his comments by stating they would be given as a private citizen. He
went on to state that the staff of the Fire Department continuously
interact with the public. Apparently they had a need to expand and had
negotiated with staff from the City of Federal Way for space at City
Hall. He noted this turned out to be very workable and the Fire
Marshall’s office now resides there. He went on to discuss what was
involved in the move and added he felt it is a cost-effective way to do
business and has allowed them the opportunity to do other critical
missions. He then referred to the idea that had been discussed by the
City of Federal Way of having a “One Stop Shop” at City Hall to assist
the development community in obtaining necessary information. Mr.
Freitas then challenged the Board to raise the value of emergency
management and discussions. He noted he had also challenged all the City
Council members to do better. It was then noted that the District has
two Board members that serve on the internal Safety and Emergency
Management Committees. Mr. Freitas explained the Greater Federal Way
Emergency Management Team that meets the second Thursday each month and
referred to the binder that each Board member has explaining their role
in an emergency. Commissioner Stewart stated he received information
regarding the larger emergency management committee in the past. He
noted that Mr. Perry attends those meetings, as had Mr. Ross in the
past, and added he felt the District has good coverage in this area.
Subsequent to the discussion, the Board thanked Mr. Freitas for
addressing them.
ACTION ITEMS
It was noted that a public hearing had been scheduled at 6:15 p.m. to
hear testimony about the proposed 2006 Rates/Budget/Fees and Charges.
Since it was that time, it was the consensus of the Board to address
this item next.
#071, 2006 Rates/Budget/Fees and Charges - Public Hearing and
Adoption – 6:15 p.m., Resolution No.’s 2005-1056, 2006-1057 and
2006-1058: At approximately 6:15 p.m. Commissioner Stewart recessed the
regular meeting and called to order a public hearing to hear testimony
from anyone in the audience relative to the proposed 2006
Rates/Budget/Fees and Charges. As there was no one in the audience who
wished to provide any public testimony, Commissioner Stewart adjourned
the public hearing and reconvened the regular meeting. It was the
consensus of the Board to consider this item as it was scheduled on the
agenda outline. The next item to consider was Action Item #69.
#69, Adelaide Beach Sewers – Planning Proposal for Amendment 4 to The
Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan: Mr. Ross began the presentation by
explaining the purpose of the amendment to the Comprehensive Wastewater
System Plan. He then stated it was the recommendation of staff that the
amendment be approved by the Board.
Upon motion of Commissioner Mayer, which was duly seconded by
Commissioner Tweddle, the Board unanimously approved the proposal
offered by PACE, Inc. in the amount of $12,857.00 to prepare Amendment 4
to the 1999 Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan and authorized the
General Manager to execute a change order to the on-call professional
planning contract with PACE to authorize the work to be performed. Mr.
Ross thanked the Board and stated he would be advising PACE of this
action the next day.
#70, Board Meeting of 12/8/2005; Discuss Canceling or Rescheduling to
12/1/2005: A discussion began as to the reason for canceling the meeting
as well as which date would be the best to reschedule the meeting. It
was noted that historically, the Board elects officers for the next year
at the first meeting in December and it would be preferable for all
Board members to be present at this meeting. Mr. Pritchett added that
there could possibly be collective bargaining discussions scheduled for
the first or the second meeting in December.
Upon motion of Commissioner Mayer, which was duly seconded by
Commissioner Tweddle, the Board unanimously approved canceling the next
regular Board meeting scheduled to be held on Thursday, December 8, 2005
and authorized scheduling a special Board meeting to be held on
Thursday, December 1, 2005 at 6:00 p.m.
#071, 2006 Rates/Budget/Fees and Charges - Public Hearing and
Adoption – 6:15 p.m., Resolution No.’s 2005-1056, 2006-1057 and
2006-1058: As there was no one in the audience to provide testimony
relating to this item during the public hearing, a discussion began
among the Board and staff. Mr. Dennis stated that all of the issues
relating to the items above had been discussed at previous meetings and
added he would be glad to answer questions. The discussion began with
the proposed Operations and Maintenance (O&M) budget. According to the
information provided in the agenda packets, Mr. Dennis stated that
within one year the District had collected more revenues than
anticipated. He added that the Capital Facilities Charges (CFC) had been
increased a bit to reflect a more realistic look at new projects of the
District. The District’s debt service had changed slightly due to bond
refinancing and the receipt of Public Works Trust Fund monies. He noted
that there were very few changes in the O&M and went on to state that
other increases reflected utility costs. In summary, Mr. Dennis stated
that not as much has been spent for O&M as projected; historically
approximately 65% to 75% of what is budgeted is spent. Mr. Dennis went
on to state that in prior years, the capital projects were presented as
a line item and this amount was merely the sum of all projects for the
coming year. He added this tends to cloud the issue between where cash
is received and where it is spent. Next Mr. Dennis explained how he
proposed changing from presenting capital projects as one line item to
setting aside funds in a reserve account to use whenever the project
occurs. If the project is not completed in 2006, there will be money set
aside for it. Mr. Dennis stated this new procedure would “levelize” the
capital cash each year and enable the Board to see a more even trend.
Mr. Dennis next discussed the CFC. He indicated he had included
suggestions that had been discussed at the last meeting with Mr. Cebron
and reviewed the different elements that are considered in developing
the charge. A discussion followed about the elements and the advantages
of incorporating some of the suggestions. Also discussed was the Board’s
philosophy that growth pays for growth and how that figures into the
CFC. Mr. Dennis next discussed the Bond Buyers interest rates that was
one of the topics discussed with Mr. Cebron at the previous meeting. It
was noted that incorporating these rates would be taking the most
conservative approach. The last item of discussion was the wastewater
system capacity. Mr. Dennis stated that capacity is currently figured on
peak flows. The suggestion at the previous meeting was the use of an
average of peak flows. Mr. Dennis went on to explain the difficulty in
figuring the capacity as suggested. There currently is very little data
available; however, each year more will be accumulated which will help
determine if the suggested way to figure would be more accurate. It was
noted that most districts in the area have surpassed Lakehaven’s CFC’s
by now. It was noted that the Fees and Charges resolution for 2006 that
will be presented to the Board for consideration at the next Board
meeting will reflect the changes that the Board had expressed interest
in. Mr. Dennis next moved to the Cash Flow Projections for 2006 and
provided a graph for illustration purposes. He explained the assumptions
that were made in the model for purposes of illustrating the cash flow
from now to 2015. Based on the information that was provided, Mr. Dennis
stated that it indicated the District would suffer a water fund
shortfall in 2012 or 2013. He then presented several options for the
Board to consider to prevent such an occurrence. One change discussed
was to change the way capital expenditures are budgeted. He then
discussed proposing an increase in water rates. He noted that if rates
are not increased the District would be facing a shortfall in the water
fund at some point within next half decade. Mr. Dennis indicated that if
the Board adopted a 3% increase in the water rate, a customer using
10,000 cubic feet of water per billing period would realize little more
than a $5.00 increase per year. He went on to briefly discuss
commercial, irrigation and multi-family customers. He reminded the Board
of the change in the multi family water rate that removed the summer
premium and stated the model he was proposing included that change. Mr.
Perry noted that Mr. Dennis had shown him the information that he had
developed and he had determined from the data that it was unnecessary to
increase the sewer rates. In summary, Mr. Dennis stated that next year
at this time, the Board will be able to see what is available for
Operations and Maintenance and what is available for capital projects.
He added that staff has been working on a financial policy that includes
this proposal as well as some other suggestions. He stated that he felt
by incorporating the proposal, it clearly demonstrates that money is
being set aside for plant improvements and repair as well as the Board’s
philosophy that growth does pay for growth. Commissioner Stewart then
referred to all the construction and improvement projects that have
occurred in the District over the last few years and commented that
eventually, some of this should subside. Mr. Perry stated the projects
would then be switched to the water mains. He noted that Lakehaven’s
piping system must have the capacity to transport water to our
neighbors. He added that this is what he recommended be done seven or
eight years ago. The proposed Fees and Charges resolution was then
discussed. The new resolution incorporated the proposed changes into the
handouts that were provided to the Board. Mr. Dennis stated that the
biggest change was the water meter installation charges. The increase in
this area is due to permit and inspection fees from both the City of
Federal Way and King County. He went on to briefly review other changes
that were included in the new resolution. He noted the resolution that
will be presented to the Board at the next meeting will include the
updated CFC charges. He added that the 2006 Budget resolution will have
incorporated within it a separate section for the inclusion of a list of
all the planned capital projects and the amount of the expenditure for
each. He then asked for Board consensus on a proposed increase in the
water rate for 2006. It was the consensus of the Board to direct staff
to include a 3% increase in the District’s water rate for 2006. Mr.
Dennis thanked the Board; in addition, the Board thanked Mr. Dennis for
the very informative presentation and all the hard work.
STAFF REPORTS
GENERAL COUNSEL: Mr. Pritchett reported a bargaining session with AFSCME representatives was scheduled for the next Monday.
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/INFORMATION SERVICES: Mr. Dennis explained the
reason for removing the Customer Service Bill Printing Outsourcing item
from the agenda. He stated that a local firm provided a proposal for
this work and he would like time to review it further before asking the
Board to consider authorizing a contract. In addition, staff wanted to
ensure that the members of the AFSCME bargaining unit had no objections
with the new procedure as these are the employees that currently perform
the work that would no longer be performed if this proposal was
authorized. Next, Mr. Dennis stated that the listing of the proposed
Capital projects for 2006 included funds for the new Utility Billing
System that had been discussed. He noted that the new version of the
system will work with the GIS system and will also allow for more people
to support it.
ENGINEERING MANAGER: Mr. Ross reported staff had recently finalized
the District’s participation in the project with the City of Federal Way
at the intersection of South 336th and First Way South and he went on to
briefly review the history of the project. He also explained the
District’s portion of the work that will be done. Next, Mr. Ross stated
that, pursuant to Board authorization, staff is beginning the recruiting
process for a Project Engineer. He noted that management is
contemplating providing a work area for the new employee at Lakehaven
Center and asked if the Board had any comments. No one expressed an
objection to Mr. Ross’s proposal.
GENERAL MANAGER: Mr. Perry reported current water flows of 1,000
gallons per minute of Second Supply project water and added this should
continue with the anticipation of increasing flows to 3 million gallons
per day. He noted staff had received no calls about chlorine, to date.
Commissioner Jovanovich reported he had received an email from someone
who expressed concern with fluoride. Mr. Perry then stated that the new
project engineer would be participating in the City’s Development Review
Committee. Next, Mr. Perry indicated he was scheduling a meeting with
representatives from the Chamber of Commerce. He then provided a status
report on several wells that were being rehabilitated for various
reasons. He added that Puget Sound Energy had requested a customer
service rating and he had expressed his disappointment in the quality of
their power. He added the District seems to have power issues each year
from September to the first of the year and he felt something needs to
be done to protect District facilities. He then provided a brief status
report on the District’s aquifer levels. Next, Mr. Perry stated several
meetings had been held with the mediator regarding bargaining issues
with the IUOE bargaining unit. He noted the mediator intended to present
a proposal to the Board with the intent of speaking to the union after
that. After a brief discussion, it was the consensus of the Board that
it would be inappropriate for the mediator to speak to the Board
directly – he should present his proposal to the bargaining team, who in
turn would report to the Board. In response, Mr. Perry indicated he
would speak with the mediator and would report back to the Board
President. He added he could review the proposal and write a response
for the Board to review.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting
was adjourned at approximately 7:45 p.m. |